Critical Assessment of Liquidity Management and Cryptocurrency in Nigeria: An ARDL Analysis

PDF

Published: 2022-08-18

Page: 404-415


Onah, Anthony Onah *

Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.

Umeokwobi, Richard Onyekachi

Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Due to the global debate on the acceptability of the emerging currency called the crypto, economists all over the world have been faced with the dilemma of rejecting or accepting the cryptocurrency. Nigeria as a developing economy is also faced with this dilemma because, some financial transactions in Nigeria are now done using the cryptocurrency and this in turn has caused some disequilibrium in the capturing and management of liquidity by the monetary authority in the economy. Based on the underlying issues, this paper seeks to investigate liquidity management and cryptocurrency in Nigeria using the vector autoregressive lag model (ARDL). The variables employed in the model were bitcoin which was used as a proxy for a cryptocurrency, while interbank rate (IBR), monetary policy rate (MPR), open buyback (OBB), and maximum lending rate (MLR) were used as proxy for liquidity management, respectively. This study covers the period January 2017 to June 2021. The result of the bounds test of the autoregressive distributive lag model reveals that there is a long run co-integration among the variables. The long-run autoregressive distributive lag model also shows that only maximum lending rate has a significant impact on bitcoin, though negative. The post estimation test demonstrates that the model is significant and robustly fit. Based on the findings, policy recommendations suggest that the monetary authority in Nigeria should maintain its regulatory stance against accepting cryptocurrency as a legal tender and be more proactive in controlling the activities of shadow organisations that are engaged in the business of converting cryptocurrencies to naira and vice versa.

Keywords: Cryptocurrency, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), Banking, liquidity management, Nigeria, autoregressive distributive lag, regulation


How to Cite

Onah, Onah, Anthony, and Umeokwobi, Richard Onyekachi. 2022. “Critical Assessment of Liquidity Management and Cryptocurrency in Nigeria: An ARDL Analysis”. Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management 4 (1):404-15. https://www.journaleconomics.org/index.php/AJEFM/article/view/132.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System; 2008.

Zhao H. Is there a stable relationship between money supply and price level? arguments on quantity theory of money. Granite Journal: a Postgraduate Interdisciplinary Journal. 2021;5(1): 13-18.

Wilson F. Will Find the Bottom and ‘Slowly’ Enter a Bull-Run (bitcoinist.com); 2019.

Available:https://www.enaira.gov.ng

Gbosi AN. Monetary policy theory. Harry Publications Company; 2005.

Humphrey TM. The quantity theory of money: Its historical evolution and role in policy debates. Economic Review; 1974.

Friedman M, Schwartz AJ. A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton University Press; 2008.

Weber EJ. Copulas and macroeconomics: The quantity theory of money. The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics. Economics Discussion / Working Papers 19-12; 2019.

Xu Q, et al. Tail-risk spillovers in cryptocurrency markets. Finance Research Letters. 2021; 38.101453.

Firat, Asdemir. Application of quantity theory of money in cryptocurrencies: Example of Bitcoin and the Impact of Covid-19. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2021;71:2021/1:81-102.

Yi S, et al. Volatility connectedness in the cryptocurrency market: Is Bitcoin a dominant cryptocurrency? International Review of Financial Analysis. 2018;60:98-114.

Hasan M, et al. Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market. Financial Innovation. 2022;8:3:1-25.

Ammous S. Economics beyond financial intermediation: Digital currencies’ potential for growth, poverty alleviation and international development. The Journal of Private Enterprise. 2015;30 (3):19-50.

DeVries PD. An analysis of cryptocurrency, bitcoin, and the future. International Journal of Business Management and Commerce. 2016;1(2):September.

Fernholz RT. Exchange rate manipulation and constructive ambiguity. International Economic Review, November. 2015; 56(14):1323-1348.

Baur DK, Dimfpl T. The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value. Empirical Economics. 2021;61:2663–2683.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01990-5

Tomić N, Todorović V, Čakajac B. The potential effects of cryptocurrencies on monetary policy. The European Journal of Applied Economics. EJAE. 2020;17(1):37 – 48.

Frank T. Bitcoin battle with Argo Blockchain; 2019.

Available:https://www.ft.com/content/68beb09a-77f8-11e9-be7d-6d846537acab

Holtmeier M, Sandner P. The impact of crypto currencies on developing countries. FSBC Working Paper, Frankfurt School, Blockchain Center; 2019.

Israel BJL. Asset-Backed digital currencies: advantages and challenges; 2022.

Available:https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/asset-backed-digital-currencies-advantages-and-challenges-48407

Keynes JM. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Springer; 2018